IETF RFC 3265 PDF

these extensions are described in section 4. · RFC A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package . Find the most up-to-date version of IETF – RFC at Engineering Find the most up-to-date version of RFC at Engineering

Author: Akishura Torg
Country: Chad
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 7 October 2004
Pages: 287
PDF File Size: 3.58 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.45 Mb
ISBN: 163-4-99889-657-5
Downloads: 98772
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kagarr

Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process. Clear description of the referenced document:.

This establishment will occur if and only if both the caller and the callee agree that the preconditions are met. However, in such an scenario as the IMS framework, it is necessary to extend this reliability to provisional responses to INVITE requests for session establishment, this is, to start a call. These include an efficient use of the radio interface by minimizing the exchange of signaling messages between the mobile terminal and the network, a minimum session setup time by performing tasks prior to session establishment instead of during session establishment, a minimum support required in the terminal, the support for roaming and non-roaming scenarios with terminal mobility management supported by the access network, not SIPand support for IPv6 addressing.

All this functionality is supported by new special header fields.

Numerous extensions exist and many more are proposed. In SIP, the route header field, filled by the sender, supports this functionality by listing 325 set of proxies the message will visit.

A typical use of this mechanism is call transfer: PUBLISH, which is used to request the publication of the state of the resource specified in the request-URI, with reference to the event stated in the Event headerand with the information carried in the message body. In the IMS, the initial session parameter negotiation can be done by using the provisional responses and session description updating extensions, along 32655 SDP in the body of the messages.

All RFCs always remain available on-line. An important source of failure is the inability to reserve network resources to support the session, so these resources should be allocated before the phone rings.

  COMPUTER ORGANIZATION BY ZAKY HAMACHER PDF

Information on RFC » RFC Editor

In this concept the caller states a set of constraints about the session i. Retrieved November 15, Tell us a bit about yourself and receive additional information about our solutions and how they can be customized to meet your specific needs. Therefore, a mechanism is needed in order to route requests to the desired device or application. This extension uses three new header fields to support the negotiation process:. Partners Overview Collaborating to set new industry standards.

The private extensions for asserted identity within trusted networks [23] are designed to enable a network of trusted SIP servers to assert the identity of authenticated users, only within an administrative domain with previously agreed policies for ieff, transport and usage of this identification information.

However, as many words are repeated in different messages, the extended operations for SigComp [34] define a way to use a shared dictionary among subsequent messages. Retrieved December 2, Support Overview Unrivaled technology surpassed only by our service. When used in request-URIs, it indicates that the request is to be compressed, while in Via header fields it signals that the subsequent response is to be compressed.

The efficient use of network resources, which may include a radio interface or other low-bandwidth access, is essential in the IMS in order to provide the user with an acceptable experience in terms of latency. The reliability of provisional responses extension [16] provides a mechanism to confirm that provisional responses such as the Ringing response codethat lets the caller know that the callee is being alerted, are successfully received.

The main functionality is supported by the P-Asserted-Identity extension header. Combining voice and video calls in a user-friendly interface, CounterPath’s X-Lite helps you seamlessly transition from a traditional phone environment into the world of Voice over IP.

Justification for the specific reference: Feedback Contact Us Accessibility. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents: It is then, when all the resources for the call are in place, when the caller is alerted.

Retrieved from ” https: This way, the registrar is able to discover and record the sequence of proxies that must be transited to get back to the user agent. Session Initiation Protocol 2. In basic SIP, this exchange eventually causes the callee to be alerted.

  GEOFFREY BATCHEN ARDER EN DESEOS PDF

Interested in buying Bria for your Macintosh?

SIP extensions for the IP Multimedia Subsystem

Merging the Internet and the Cellular Worlds 3 ed. The necessity in the IMS of reserving resources to provide quality of service QoS leads to another security issue: Justification for the specific reference:. To achieve this goal, SIP messages can be compressed using the mechanism known as SigComp [33] signaling compression.

Therefore, NAT traversal mechanisms are needed for both the signaling plane and the media plane. This way the recipient of the message can decide whether efc not to follow the reference to fetch the resource, depending on the bandwidth available.

Other useful information describing the “Quality” of the document:.

ITU-T A.5 reference justification

Apart from all the explained extensions to SIP that make it possible for the IMS to work successfully, it is also necessary that the IMS framework interworks and exchanges services with existing gfc infrastructures, mainly the Public switched telephone network PSTN. This mechanism is necessary since SIP rfv run not only over reliable transport protocols TCP that assure that the message is delivered, but also over unreliable ones UDP that offer no delivery guarantees, and it is even possible that both kinds of protocols are present in different parts of the transport network.

Accept-Contact to describe the desired destination user agents, Reject-Contact to state the user agents to avoid, and Request-Disposition to specify how the request should be handled by servers in the network i. In this case, Uniform Resource Names are used to identify a service e.

Stream Compression XEP The new SDP attributes are meant to describe the current status of the resource reservation, the desired status of the reservation to proceed with session establishment, and the confirmation statusto indicate when the reservation status should be confirmed. Dfc useful information describing the “Quality” of the document: