Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.

Author: Feshura Kazilar
Country: Canada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 12 July 2010
Pages: 222
PDF File Size: 13.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.67 Mb
ISBN: 281-3-36433-426-4
Downloads: 3467
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mezishura

Likewise, characteristics of the statements could vary in relation to the participant’s ability to generate a plausible statement. Toward psicoligica Cognitive Lie Detection Approach.

None of the phenomenological characteristics studied turned out to be significant for discriminating between actual and simulated victims. Knowledge of crime context: Twenty-nine persons with intellectual disability participated in the study.

Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi

Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55 4 Reality monitoring of perkcial of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. An experimental and HDV study.

Police Studies, 17, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, The same instructions were given for all interviews conducted: Such procedures do not exist at this time, however, which means that persons with ID are often excluded from the justice system or evaluated on the basis of a comparison with children.


Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57— Prevalence of disabled people involved in Spanish Civil Guard’s police activity.

A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Research on fragile X syndrome testimoio autism: Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36 1 Objects, Motions and Paths: As may be appreciated from the graph in Figure 2one possible explanation for the scant difference between the two types of statements stems from intersubject variability, which would indicate that this technique has low diagnostic capability.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Table 2 shows the mean scores and standard deviations for false statements and true statements and the totals for each criterion. Juror’s perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. This approach, which would mean fewer criteria, should be discarded, however, because whether these two criteria are present most likely depends on a great variety of factors, such as the type ee event described, the time elapsed, and the witness’s abilities, for example.

A guide for helping professionals. Sexuality and Disability, 11, Two “blind” researchers, experts at interviewing and taking testimony, interviewed each participant individually.

Law and Human Behavior, 27, Thus, in a population of persons with severe ID or with a specific syndrome involving language disorders, perhaps the credibility criteria that prove to be significant for distinguishing between true and false statements would be different.


The less scientific road to truth.

A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: On the other hand, the wide variability in memory origin means that the characteristics differentiating fantasies, lies, dreams, and post-event information are not the same.

Method Participants Twenty-nine persons with intellectual disability participated in the study. A researcher selected the participants, all of comparable IQ, on the basis of criteria for the “true” group-did go on the day trip-and the “false” group-did not go on the day trip but knew about the event from references made to it. The psychology of criminal evidence.

Evaluación de la credibilidad de relatos de personas con discapacidad intelectual

Verschuere Ed Detecting Deception: Who were you with? Effects of preparation on internal and external memories. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, Experimental Aging Research, 31 2 ,